4 Dec 2024 12:11 pm
No they aren't. They determine what the preponderance of evidence points at. In doing so, they may determine something factual, but the two aren't the same. If civil courts had to determine facts, there would be no requirement for criminal courts, as the evidentiary standard of a civil court would be sufficient for bothBlackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Civil courts are also "finders of fact", Nursey.
Your ignorance is tedious.
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.